SANCIAN delivers end-to-end assessments of program effectiveness, efficiency, and equity — paired with strategic roadmaps, governance models, and sustainability planning aligned to HHS mission and international standards.
This practice area is where SANCIAN's frameworks close the loop. Federal programs that adopted AI under earlier engagements return here for rigorous, independent evaluation — did the model reduce clinician burden as designed, did the dashboard change decisions in the direction intended, did the equity-impact analysis prove out in deployment.
The output is not a satisfaction report. It is a mission-aligned assessment of effectiveness, efficiency, and equity — paired with an actionable strategic roadmap for the next 24–36 months.
Every engagement is scoped, priced, and delivered against these standard deliverables. Custom scope available on request.
End-to-end evaluation of federal program effectiveness, efficiency, and equity — mixed-methods analysis, stakeholder engagement, defensible findings.
24–36 month strategic roadmaps for federal programs — phased implementation, resource planning, dependency mapping.
Governance structures for federal AI programs — decision rights, escalation paths, review cadence, sunset criteria.
Long-term sustainability frameworks for federal AI investments — funding pathways, workforce continuity, technical debt management.
Evaluation support for programs spanning multiple federal agencies — alignment analysis, coordination model design, joint governance.
Facilitation and support for independent evaluation panels — panelist recruitment, evaluation criteria, defensible reporting.
Each engagement is anchored in named methodologies with documented standards alignment — the artifacts required for federal review, produced by design.
Program evaluation is the culmination of the SANCIAN™ 7-phase framework — Phases 06 (Measure) and 07 (Adapt) provide the structured evaluation approach, with feedback into Phase 01 for the next cycle.
Evaluation methodology aligned to PMBOK program management standards and Kotter's change principles — federal program governance done to industry-recognized standards.
Every evaluation carries an equity lens — effectiveness for whom, at what cost, under what conditions.
Post-deployment readiness re-evaluation — has governance held, has workforce capacity grown, has infrastructure kept pace.
Representative engagement patterns for federal agencies and international institutions. Actual scope, duration, and pricing determined per engagement.
Comprehensive assessment of a federal health AI program — effectiveness, efficiency, equity, sustainability recommendations.
Multi-year strategic roadmap for reimbursement-aligned AI adoption — governance, phasing, sustainability planning.
Governance model design for cross-agency AI surveillance program — decision rights, review cadence, sunset criteria.
Every practice engagement runs on one or more of SANCIAN's proprietary frameworks — named, trademarked, tested.
Phases 06 (Measure) and 07 (Adapt) are this practice's home — with feedback into Phase 01 for the next lifecycle.
Post-deployment readiness re-evaluation — the diagnostic re-run to close the governance loop.
Equity lens applied to every program evaluation — effectiveness for whom, under what conditions.
Contracting officers may procure under the codes below. Full SANCIAN registration includes 25 NAICS codes — the subset shown here is most relevant to Practice 05.
| 541611 | Administrative Management & Consulting |
| 541618 | Other Management Consulting |
| 541720 | Research & Development |
| 541690 | Scientific & Technical Consulting |
| R410 | Support-Professional: Program Evaluation |
| R408 | Support-Professional: Program Management |
| R499 | Support-Professional: Other |
Request the Capability Statement, schedule a briefing with Dr. Crawford, or reach the Government Business POC directly. SANCIAN responds to federal and institutional inquiries within one business day.
